Evolution of Modern to Post-Modern Portfolio Theory

The Journey from Harry Markowitz to Downside Risk Optimization

The world of investment theory has undergone significant transformation since the 1950s, evolving from the foundational ideas of Harry Markowitz to the more sophisticated and nuanced approaches of today. This evolution marks the transition from modern to post-modern portfolio theory, reflecting the continuous quest for better risk management and investment optimization.

  1. Birth of Portfolio Theory

    In the 1950s, Harry Markowitz revolutionized investment strategies with his groundbreaking work on Portfolio Theory. His development of the mean-variance model laid the foundation for modern investment theory, introducing the concept of diversification to minimize risk while maximizing returns.

  2. Introduction of CAPM and Sharpe Ratio

    The 1960s saw further advancements with Bill Sharpe's development of the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and the Sharpe Ratio. These tools provided investors with new ways to measure and manage risk-adjusted returns. However, during this period, Hadar & Russell also highlighted some limitations of the mean-variance theory, suggesting it didn't always hold true in practice.

  3. Application and Expansion of Theories

    In the 1970s, Bill Fouse was the first to apply CAPM to portfolio management at Wells Fargo, demonstrating its practical applications. Simultaneously, Peter Fishburn introduced the mean-downside risk theory, offering an alternative perspective on risk management by focusing on potential losses rather than overall variability.

  4. Developing Richer Frameworks

    The 1980s were marked by significant theoretical expansions. Fishburn proposed that Markowitz's work was part of a broader framework. Frank Sortino founded the Pension Research Institute (PRI) at San Francisco State, where he, along with Forsey, developed the Downside Risk Optimizer and the Sortino Ratio. These innovations provided new tools for managing downside risk, a critical concern for many investors.

  5. Critical Evaluations and New Models

    During the 1990s, the investment community saw both critiques and advancements. Sortino and Forsey introduced the Omega Excess model, while Sortino & Van der Meer published influential papers on Downside Risk and the Upside Potential Ratio. Sharpe’s work on Style Analysis further refined investment strategies. Meanwhile, Eugene Fama pointed out empirical failures of the CAPM, questioning its universal applicability.

  6. Behavioral Finance and Advanced Optimization

    The turn of the century brought new dimensions to investment theory. In 2001, Sortino & Satchell published "Managing Downside Risk in Financial Markets," a seminal work in the field. The next year, Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky’s exploration of Behavioral Finance shed light on investors’ systematic biases and risk preferences. In 2006, Andrew Rudd criticized CAPM’s relevance for individual investors, and by 2007, Bill Sharpe had rejected both CAPM and the Markowitz model.

    In 2007, Sortino and Forsey founded Sortino Investment Advisors, further enhancing their contribution to the field with the development of the DTR® Optimizer. Sortino’s 2010 publication, "The Sortino Framework for Constructing Portfolios," provided a comprehensive guide for building investment strategies focused on downside risk.

Conclusion

The evolution from modern to post-modern portfolio theory highlights the dynamic nature of investment strategies and the ongoing quest for better risk management tools. From Markowitz's pioneering work in the 1950s to Sortino's advanced downside risk optimization techniques, the field has continually evolved to meet the changing needs of investors. This journey underscores the importance of innovation and adaptation in achieving investment success.